U.S. neutrality or betrayal? What will the Starlink shutdown during wartime reveal? - Igal Levin

Once again, filtering out the essence from the informational fluff, it is crucial to state the main point: if the U.S. cuts off already ordered weapons for Ukraine through USAI or disables Starlink, it will be direct military assistance to Moscow.

This is no longer diplomatic maneuvering; it is direct support for the Russians. Communication, just like logistics, is the foundation of any military operation. If you sever communication for someone in a war, you are not neutral—you are directly aiding the other warring side.

I fully acknowledge that the U.S. might reach such a point while attempting to save Russia at some stage. However, it is essential to understand clearly: this will no longer be "neutrality" but rather alignment with one of the warring parties.

You know how those tables on Wikipedia show one side in one column and the opposing side in another? Well, the U.S. will be listed alongside the Russians in the column against Ukraine, against Europe.

It is important to articulate this (regarding USAI and Starlink) to avoid any informational clutter later about "it's complicated," "it was misunderstood," and so on.