According to a survey conducted by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology ( KMIS ) (), published by RBC-Ukraine, 81% of Ukrainians believe that the country was inadequately prepared for Russia's full-scale invasion three years ago. A significant portion, 41% of respondents, attribute the primary responsibility for this to the country's political leadership.

Volunteer from the "Ukrainian Team," Orest Krystafovych, notes in his Facebook post that despite the prolonged conflict in Donbas and numerous warnings from international partners, the authorities chose a policy of appeasement instead of an active defense strategy. He emphasizes that there were no fortified borders, widespread training for the civilian population, or proper support for territorial defense (except in a few cities like Kyiv, where local authorities took action).

Krystafovych also points out that official statements such as "Panic is worse than war" led to a dismissal of the real threat, which he believes cost Ukraine dearly. He concludes: “Ukrainians paid a terrible price for this miscalculation. And today, we must not only draw conclusions but also demand accountability. For without truth, there can be no victory.”

These survey results and the volunteer's comments highlight the importance of transparency and accountability in government regarding national security and defense issues.